By Olumide Akinrinlola
The controversy surrounding Governor Lucky Aiyedatiwa’s reference to Minister of Interior, Olubunmi Tunji-Ojo, as his “subject” appears to have been driven largely by a misinterpretation of the governor’s intention.
Governor Aiyedatiwa is an educated man, an experienced public official and the chief executive of Ondo State. He is familiar with the principles of governance and administration and understands that Tunji-Ojo, as a federal minister, reports to the President of Nigeria—not to the state governor.
It is therefore unreasonable to assume that the governor meant the minister was politically or administratively subordinate to him. In the context of the statement, “subject” was more likely used in a traditional or cultural sense, referring to Tunji-Ojo as an indigene or citizen of Ondo State, with the governor speaking as the state’s number one citizen.
Unfortunately, some supporters of the minister were quick to interpret the expression negatively and take the matter to social media. In doing so, they created tension around an issue that may not have required controversy in the first place.
There also appears to be a growing tendency among some political supporters to present Tunji-Ojo and Governor Aiyedatiwa as political rivals. That perception is misplaced. Tunji-Ojo would not seek to become governor if a ministerial position were considered a rival office to that of the governor.
If he eventually openly declares his intention to govern Ondo State, he would not necessarily be contesting against Aiyedatiwa. So, why the hullabaloo and needless rivalry being peddled by some of their supporters?
The minister has achieved significant milestones for Ondo State in his capacity, and his supporters should focus on highlighting those accomplishments rather than creating unnecessary friction. Overzealous followers should stop dragging both men into needless controversy.
The governor is therefore not his rival, and there is no justification for turning every public statement into a political confrontation that could divide both camps and create further cracks within the ruling party in Ondo State.
Healthy political differences are part of democracy, but they should not be allowed to undermine the unity of the state. Supporters of public officials should exercise restraint, seek clarification where necessary and avoid deliberately creating divisions between leaders who occupy different political positions.
The minister’s achievements and growing national profile can be acknowledged without portraying him as a rival to the governor. Similarly, Governor Aiyedatiwa’s constitutional position as the chief executive of Ondo State should be respected without misrepresenting his words or intentions.
The people of Ondo State need cooperation, maturity and responsible political engagement—not unnecessary online battles. Both leaders have important roles to play to Ondo State, and their supporters should focus on promoting development and unity rather than manufacturing conflicts where none exists.
Olumide Akinrinlola writes from Toronto, Canada.
Leave a Reply